Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-05 14:55:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D2ADF4168C9B3F7A96FC09406E55E641775D68D4A160ECC4EBDFFFAC461E6B42
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The original tweet does not confirm or deny this is plagiarism. The proposed note is itself misleading, as the cases cited involve far more substantial copying and in some cases completely misrepresenting authorship.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743160090843382108
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D2ADF4168C9B3F7A96FC09406E55E641775D68D4A160ECC4EBDFFFAC461E6B42
  • createdAtMillis - 1704466517212
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1743160090843382108D2ADF4168C9B3F7A96FC09406E55E641775D68D4A160ECC4EBDFFFAC461E6B42