Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-05 10:28:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7CB6F6304F9E6F55D7553DE358778799CF435CC9018693216F28F446895EFD32
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The original tweet does not confirm or deny this is plagiarism. The proposed note is itself misleading, as the cases cited involve far more substantial copying and in some cases completely misrepresenting authorship.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743160090843382108
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7CB6F6304F9E6F55D7553DE358778799CF435CC9018693216F28F446895EFD32
  • createdAtMillis - 1704450516820
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17431600908433821087CB6F6304F9E6F55D7553DE358778799CF435CC9018693216F28F446895EFD32