Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-05 10:14:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C6DFD28A0884B52B4B0E6EE9D31F39E2FFA3A68E4CA20C9EDF83F45382728E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The original tweet does not confirm or deny this is plagiarism. The proposed note is itself misleading, as the cases cited involve far more substantial copying and in some cases completely misrepresenting authorship.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743160090843382108
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C6DFD28A0884B52B4B0E6EE9D31F39E2FFA3A68E4CA20C9EDF83F45382728E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1704449646723
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17431600908433821083C6DFD28A0884B52B4B0E6EE9D31F39E2FFA3A68E4CA20C9EDF83F45382728E0