Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-06 05:42:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F5CEC9D0D4DA22021CD5BCB4F61CC5479FFE08D0D48B8E34005A9A00AC91219
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The original tweet does not confirm or deny this is plagiarism. The proposed note is itself misleading, as the cases cited involve far more substantial copying and in some cases completely misrepresenting authorship.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743160090843382108
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F5CEC9D0D4DA22021CD5BCB4F61CC5479FFE08D0D48B8E34005A9A00AC91219
  • createdAtMillis - 1704519759969
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17431600908433821080F5CEC9D0D4DA22021CD5BCB4F61CC5479FFE08D0D48B8E34005A9A00AC91219