Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-05 16:14:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7D42FD3D9002FCD1C687E4E4E82455E3099D91E912BC632FF7C1B27436E0A5C0
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://twitter.com/NeriOxman/status/1742993073078947843?t=yWiAmJboCWOfjpXDRVTCqw The claim of plagiarism refers to 4 instances within a 330 page document, where the source was in fact properly referenced at the end of the paragraph in question as well as in the detailed bibliography at the end of the document, but where the quotation marks had been omitted

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743078858138476753
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7D42FD3D9002FCD1C687E4E4E82455E3099D91E912BC632FF7C1B27436E0A5C0
  • createdAtMillis - 1704471253425
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17430788581384767537D42FD3D9002FCD1C687E4E4E82455E3099D91E912BC632FF7C1B27436E0A5C0