Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-05 05:03:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3430AE31A06407284E287716295BB6692BDB07946F53D2046D1112114FF4B3DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://twitter.com/NeriOxman/status/1742993073078947843?t=yWiAmJboCWOfjpXDRVTCqw The claim of plagiarism refers to 4 instances within a 330 page document, where the source was in fact properly referenced at the end of the paragraph in question as well as in the detailed bibliography at the end of the document, but where the quotation marks had been omitted

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743078858138476753
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3430AE31A06407284E287716295BB6692BDB07946F53D2046D1112114FF4B3DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1704431004418
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17430788581384767533430AE31A06407284E287716295BB6692BDB07946F53D2046D1112114FF4B3DE