Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-05 04:29:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0EF4924819EE32FAD73622155CFC30DD2759F1B1D443021F55F7111D8C0AFCB4
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://twitter.com/NeriOxman/status/1742993073078947843?t=yWiAmJboCWOfjpXDRVTCqw The claim of plagiarism refers to 4 instances within a 330 page document, where the source was in fact properly referenced at the end of the paragraph in question as well as in the detailed bibliography at the end of the document, but where the quotation marks had been omitted

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743078858138476753
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0EF4924819EE32FAD73622155CFC30DD2759F1B1D443021F55F7111D8C0AFCB4
  • createdAtMillis - 1704428947277
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17430788581384767530EF4924819EE32FAD73622155CFC30DD2759F1B1D443021F55F7111D8C0AFCB4