Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-05 01:24:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 07DDC53ED83F55C73430526DF711BC549A99DEEA6B297CBC0AB17AA782EBEFDB
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://twitter.com/NeriOxman/status/1742993073078947843?t=yWiAmJboCWOfjpXDRVTCqw The claim of plagiarism refers to 4 instances within a 330 page document, where the source was in fact properly referenced at the end of the paragraph in question as well as in the detailed bibliography at the end of the document, but where the quotation marks had been omitted

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743078858138476753
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 07DDC53ED83F55C73430526DF711BC549A99DEEA6B297CBC0AB17AA782EBEFDB
  • createdAtMillis - 1704417894076
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174307885813847675307DDC53ED83F55C73430526DF711BC549A99DEEA6B297CBC0AB17AA782EBEFDB