Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-05 08:59:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2CE22DD3369E9678E4F1D2C465C9DABA50688C2B57384A9C248DCEAFB0ACF1DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

De niet-representatieve peiling van Godderis is niet alleen methodologisch foutief, er wordt ook enkel gebruik gemaakt van cijfers die hijzelf belangrijk acht. Aangezien de ‘peiling’ prematuur eindigde is er geen definitieve uitslag, dusdanig klopt de grafiek niet. https://x.com/nonunsenses/status/1743002070855135509?s=46&t=kzyJI7ZCo-vlKrvdBnXD-Q

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743033883786891612
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2CE22DD3369E9678E4F1D2C465C9DABA50688C2B57384A9C248DCEAFB0ACF1DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1704445155908
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17430338837868916122CE22DD3369E9678E4F1D2C465C9DABA50688C2B57384A9C248DCEAFB0ACF1DD