Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-05 05:42:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D24623916E112DEFF17B37158717A827F83096EE963FC0ED93820F1188C3EB27
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note fails to mention that the imprecision of the study is based on results from France, Turkey, and Belgium, not the United States and furthermore, "this number is probably underestimated because of the lack of data from most countries." NNN https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S075333222301853X

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743022240860717323
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D24623916E112DEFF17B37158717A827F83096EE963FC0ED93820F1188C3EB27
  • createdAtMillis - 1704433341309
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1743022240860717323D24623916E112DEFF17B37158717A827F83096EE963FC0ED93820F1188C3EB27