Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-05 14:51:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7B4D1F9279A6F11706C945EC7F1A23DE2922A71D82539C7417782036FCB17A3C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note fails to mention that the imprecision of the study is based on results from France, Turkey, and Belgium, not the United States and furthermore, "this number is probably underestimated because of the lack of data from most countries." NNN https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S075333222301853X

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743022240860717323
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7B4D1F9279A6F11706C945EC7F1A23DE2922A71D82539C7417782036FCB17A3C
  • createdAtMillis - 1704466295767
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17430222408607173237B4D1F9279A6F11706C945EC7F1A23DE2922A71D82539C7417782036FCB17A3C