Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-04 23:50:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5579F241219C5C392478E2656AA9B5D33653E5E42707E2A2F0FA2BD4E7970F12
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note fails to mention that the imprecision of the study is based on results from France, Turkey, and Belgium, not the United States and furthermore, "this number is probably underestimated because of the lack of data from most countries." NNN https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S075333222301853X

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743022240860717323
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5579F241219C5C392478E2656AA9B5D33653E5E42707E2A2F0FA2BD4E7970F12
  • createdAtMillis - 1704412215117
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17430222408607173235579F241219C5C392478E2656AA9B5D33653E5E42707E2A2F0FA2BD4E7970F12