Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-04 21:10:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39DE11B1C507C368354E3EEB2E8949E9B0FB6979B41715B39881BACE431A7122
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP cites a scientific study published by a news article but does not cite the study nor the article. It would appear OP is talking about this study: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S075333222301853X The study’s conclusion states “our estimates are limited by their imprecision”

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743016470140121287
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39DE11B1C507C368354E3EEB2E8949E9B0FB6979B41715B39881BACE431A7122
  • createdAtMillis - 1704402603813
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 174301647014012128739DE11B1C507C368354E3EEB2E8949E9B0FB6979B41715B39881BACE431A7122