Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-05 04:43:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1F19112D4D120B3E8A09EC0F1C770B1E52020173A9CEEAFE49D21A6305D49B79
Participant Details

Original Note:

Yes, the account is anti-vax spam, but I don't see any primary sources for what did happen to the woman, so the tweet itself is not incorrect. A personal blog which makes an unsourced claim that she was actually fine isn't a sufficient source to justify a community note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743006834359783717
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1F19112D4D120B3E8A09EC0F1C770B1E52020173A9CEEAFE49D21A6305D49B79
  • createdAtMillis - 1704429784054
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17430068343597837171F19112D4D120B3E8A09EC0F1C770B1E52020173A9CEEAFE49D21A6305D49B79