Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-04 15:06:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F10B53EE435D446B9C663602EC65D18A8705EF83DFA84F85499DE9750F252DC7
Participant Details

Original Note:

To the ones putting NNN: the notes are correct. The post is claiming that this specific excerpt is absolute proof of innocence, when it's not. It's just Maxwell's testimony, and that needs to be noted. If you want to talk about other documents, then you take it to the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1742909625672909081
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F10B53EE435D446B9C663602EC65D18A8705EF83DFA84F85499DE9750F252DC7
  • createdAtMillis - 1704380808818
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1742909625672909081F10B53EE435D446B9C663602EC65D18A8705EF83DFA84F85499DE9750F252DC7