Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-01 21:52:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 727DD4DFF5087A91A8F1EC6F5FBEE945899A5C96FE2C534541337BCB1F212185
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The existing critical notes include the phrase "no evidence," which is an argument from ignorance, and is fallacious because there *is* substantial evidence when the word 'evidence’ is correctly defined. And, the post expresses an opinion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/evidence

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1742890282180333893
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 727DD4DFF5087A91A8F1EC6F5FBEE945899A5C96FE2C534541337BCB1F212185
  • createdAtMillis - 1706824378105
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1742890282180333893727DD4DFF5087A91A8F1EC6F5FBEE945899A5C96FE2C534541337BCB1F212185