Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-04 01:48:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E57B88425E42E963416E515FDED906BC55B156C9C78C192EEE1D3BF822A50DB9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the attempted note on the post is referring to a different case, in which Trump was found civilly liably only for non-consensual penetration with his fingers rather than non-consensual penetration with his penis. It is easy to get these muddled up as there are so many: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/assault-allegations-donald-trump-recapped

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1742702472114622602
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E57B88425E42E963416E515FDED906BC55B156C9C78C192EEE1D3BF822A50DB9
createdAtMillis - 1704332937819
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1742702472114622602E57B88425E42E963416E515FDED906BC55B156C9C78C192EEE1D3BF822A50DB9