Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-10 16:29:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7CCB0B224E178A9B69E4E94B68A4BD0EE21A097699A0CCEFD21C7A186F9B2D64
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the attempted note on the post is referring to a different case, in which Trump was found civilly liably only for non-consensual penetration with his fingers rather than non-consensual penetration with his penis. It is easy to get these muddled up as there are so many: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/assault-allegations-donald-trump-recapped

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1742702472114622602
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7CCB0B224E178A9B69E4E94B68A4BD0EE21A097699A0CCEFD21C7A186F9B2D64
  • createdAtMillis - 1710088144304
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17427024721146226027CCB0B224E178A9B69E4E94B68A4BD0EE21A097699A0CCEFD21C7A186F9B2D64