Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-03 22:46:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 21271BB301D6654B88E0B7750DABD5859D0DDFA9C8BF12692B0892482A0142DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Gay did not repeatedly violate Harvard's rules against plagiarism. An independent review initiated by the university found a few instances of inadequate citation. The analysis however, found no violation of Harvard's standards for research misconduct. https://www.harvard.edu/blog/2023/12/12/statement-from-the-harvard-corporation-our-president/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1742667274522370109
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 21271BB301D6654B88E0B7750DABD5859D0DDFA9C8BF12692B0892482A0142DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1704321998305
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 174266727452237010921271BB301D6654B88E0B7750DABD5859D0DDFA9C8BF12692B0892482A0142DE