Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-03 13:53:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98F727435D4C5F85CD8C0DC426DF612E38AA6271790B9C25A9BB443087625BFD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Het heeft niets te maken met rechtse activisten zoals de kop suggereert, naast haar (schandalige) optreden waarin ze antisemitisme niet wilde veroordelen wordt ze (meervoudig) beschuldigd van oa plagiaat. Ook is de vrouw ‘woke’, dus geen reden aanhalingstekens te gebruiken. https://nypost.com/2023/12/13/news/harvard-redefining-plagiarism-by-standing-by-claudine-gay-claims-academic-she-accused-of-copying/amp/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1742515230352064594
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 98F727435D4C5F85CD8C0DC426DF612E38AA6271790B9C25A9BB443087625BFD
createdAtMillis - 1704289987985
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 174251523035206459498F727435D4C5F85CD8C0DC426DF612E38AA6271790B9C25A9BB443087625BFD