Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-04 01:54:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BDC3EBE31A25EF173DDF9E49D4A27008812F65D932AF07868E260AC592434CCC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The current CN links to an article that makes the opposite case of what the CN is trying to argue, besides there's also an argument to be made that the charges were incorrect as the victims were under the age of consent, so either find a better source or put it in a comment. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1742472635135533373
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BDC3EBE31A25EF173DDF9E49D4A27008812F65D932AF07868E260AC592434CCC
  • createdAtMillis - 1704333249143
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1742472635135533373BDC3EBE31A25EF173DDF9E49D4A27008812F65D932AF07868E260AC592434CCC