Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-03 11:13:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0357F5D97BB54072C5810C24127A6F7A7E31D1AD493958B68C8FB41E46F23BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

ノートID 1742169494318194944の前半について、確かに最終的には被災地に全額送られたようですが、該当候補者の当初の発信が間違っていたわけではなく、批判を受けて方針を改めたに過ぎません。 「〜ととれる発信を行ったものの、実際には全額が被災地に〜」という言い方は、発信が間違っていたと誤認させる書き方で不適切です。 https://www.sankei.com/article/20160418-3ATASTYVVNOWFOPTFAUVLLTZHY/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1742431483128938833
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C0357F5D97BB54072C5810C24127A6F7A7E31D1AD493958B68C8FB41E46F23BE
  • createdAtMillis - 1704280384216
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1742431483128938833C0357F5D97BB54072C5810C24127A6F7A7E31D1AD493958B68C8FB41E46F23BE