Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-03 15:29:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A3B81C33BA86B34AFCB5B56E63B3CFEC691C7FC56ED81B54DBF2F26352749CFC
Participant Details

Original Note:

ノートID 1742169494318194944の前半について、確かに最終的には被災地に全額送られたようですが、該当候補者の当初の発信が間違っていたわけではなく、批判を受けて方針を改めたに過ぎません。 「〜ととれる発信を行ったものの、実際には全額が被災地に〜」という言い方は、発信が間違っていたと誤認させる書き方で不適切です。 https://www.sankei.com/article/20160418-3ATASTYVVNOWFOPTFAUVLLTZHY/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1742431483128938833
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A3B81C33BA86B34AFCB5B56E63B3CFEC691C7FC56ED81B54DBF2F26352749CFC
  • createdAtMillis - 1704295759028
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1742431483128938833A3B81C33BA86B34AFCB5B56E63B3CFEC691C7FC56ED81B54DBF2F26352749CFC