Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-03 13:28:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4CFA12E9D8F8A31849AB221E19083CCC8C8A4D3A17257F607FF5F426203DD618
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The post talks about Harvard not proving plagiarism. The sources in CNs did not show that it was proven. Opinions on whether there actually was plagiarism or not, and whether the fact that Harvard didn't prove it is important or not, are just that, opinions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1742344551740964922
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4CFA12E9D8F8A31849AB221E19083CCC8C8A4D3A17257F607FF5F426203DD618
  • createdAtMillis - 1704288492297
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17423445517409649224CFA12E9D8F8A31849AB221E19083CCC8C8A4D3A17257F607FF5F426203DD618