Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-03 10:57:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F8F984FDC22D65E6BA20059ED5A507311C692971D8C64FEF7DDE0E22EA76610C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Saying that someone's testimony whilst under Hamas is unreliable but that it suddenly becomes reliable after the person in question is actively being prompted by Israeli news sources is obviously disingenuous. First article is just a series of claims with no evidence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1742254389434241191
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F8F984FDC22D65E6BA20059ED5A507311C692971D8C64FEF7DDE0E22EA76610C
  • createdAtMillis - 1704279465367
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1742254389434241191F8F984FDC22D65E6BA20059ED5A507311C692971D8C64FEF7DDE0E22EA76610C