Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-03 12:24:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CAC93714C6E15676066AE5AABC11A60483338083A768DBE47D83D4A0ED0B2E3E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Soud v 3. bodu odůvodnění výslovně připomíná, že se nezabýval tím, zda se ministerstvo spravedlnosti dopustilo vůči Janu Benýškovi nezákonnosti. Městský soud v Praze tak žalobu odmítl pouze z procesních důvodů. https://x.com/lukasvalasek/status/1742197274959126856?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1742199160210690081
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CAC93714C6E15676066AE5AABC11A60483338083A768DBE47D83D4A0ED0B2E3E
  • createdAtMillis - 1704284686431
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1742199160210690081CAC93714C6E15676066AE5AABC11A60483338083A768DBE47D83D4A0ED0B2E3E