Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-02 14:06:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 51DA49F0440B07093427ECE3F58325C8D9FF0719484122BBDD2ECD5583564A57
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note Not Needed: even if post violated X's TOS, and it is, IMO, a disgusting opinion, it is nevertheless a personal one and not a reason for having a Community Note. We can report the tweet though for violating TOS.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1742145637796221039
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 51DA49F0440B07093427ECE3F58325C8D9FF0719484122BBDD2ECD5583564A57
  • createdAtMillis - 1704204361084
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174214563779622103951DA49F0440B07093427ECE3F58325C8D9FF0719484122BBDD2ECD5583564A57