Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-02 09:56:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D221F9F2852162116F14B4F8240560B597F5A9678E915A60BB1D1EC1DEA39407
Participant Details

Original Note:

Leibovici’s paper was one of many of BMJ’s Christmas spoofs, appearing in the journal alongside other joke articles. But eight years later the paper was cited, unironically, in a review paper from a well-respected organization. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/12/the-ethics-of-sarcastic-science/383988/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1742095803072602368
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D221F9F2852162116F14B4F8240560B597F5A9678E915A60BB1D1EC1DEA39407
  • createdAtMillis - 1704189379189
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1742095803072602368D221F9F2852162116F14B4F8240560B597F5A9678E915A60BB1D1EC1DEA39407