Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-02 06:49:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ECA36F4E1D9518F8FF4875ACE6B6B27FADD575640DF1A21270183665EC64687F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN nicht immer kann man mit "sarkasmus" und "rhetorische frage" argumentieren.Die rhetorische frage suggeriert mit dem video, dass es sich um bürgergeldempfänger handelt, die zu viel Geld haben, um sich pyro zu leisten.Eine Klarstellung darf nicht in den Kommentaren untergehen https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorische_Frage?wprov=sfla1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1741888976833675435
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ECA36F4E1D9518F8FF4875ACE6B6B27FADD575640DF1A21270183665EC64687F
  • createdAtMillis - 1704178173663
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1741888976833675435ECA36F4E1D9518F8FF4875ACE6B6B27FADD575640DF1A21270183665EC64687F