Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-03 14:10:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59138A5AF711F1610E9F7DF12303E68B953C5A5D398308B12425323F60B57F38
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The critical note includes the phrase "no evidence," which is an argument from ignorance, and is also incorrect, because there is substantial evidence, when the proper definition of 'evidence' is applied. Also tweet expresses an opinion about a public health crisis. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/evidence

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1741814009001648167
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 59138A5AF711F1610E9F7DF12303E68B953C5A5D398308B12425323F60B57F38
  • createdAtMillis - 1704291041023
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174181400900164816759138A5AF711F1610E9F7DF12303E68B953C5A5D398308B12425323F60B57F38