Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-01 17:53:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3FFC97B895997757C0F6A5F84E24ECC3FE02FA0361CA7A865B68F49AD990D3D5
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is zero evidence that this ranking is racist or anything more than just personal opinion. This could actually be concidered as defamation of character. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/example/english/personal-opinion https://www.forbes.com/advisor/legal/personal-injury/defamation-of-character/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1741803105921200314
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3FFC97B895997757C0F6A5F84E24ECC3FE02FA0361CA7A865B68F49AD990D3D5
  • createdAtMillis - 1704131616227
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17418031059212003143FFC97B895997757C0F6A5F84E24ECC3FE02FA0361CA7A865B68F49AD990D3D5