Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-01 11:36:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 143DA16A9BD0B5ECD89D0D95F484B8D9E526729496E3D276EB6D54A9083AB848
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post is one side of the legal case. Opposing counsel's arguments can be brought in comments but ought not be included in a CN as this would be misleading. (i.e. indicating the opposing counsel is correct when the case hasn't been tried)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1741783716958286199
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 143DA16A9BD0B5ECD89D0D95F484B8D9E526729496E3D276EB6D54A9083AB848
  • createdAtMillis - 1704109010402
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1741783716958286199143DA16A9BD0B5ECD89D0D95F484B8D9E526729496E3D276EB6D54A9083AB848