Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-03 11:26:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C7371E65D7DC4A548EFFD4EC1B43354ADE6A07924027603C8886F07D5A0A18D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article is not about defending a politician but criticising feminists/organisations who were quick to be outraged by the joke but who ignore much bigger harms to women’s interests, perceived to be too awkward to mention. This is very clear if you read the article: https://archive.ph/PxR4t

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1741771310240243807
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C7371E65D7DC4A548EFFD4EC1B43354ADE6A07924027603C8886F07D5A0A18D1
  • createdAtMillis - 1725362798139
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1741771310240243807C7371E65D7DC4A548EFFD4EC1B43354ADE6A07924027603C8886F07D5A0A18D1