Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-01 18:14:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9A100727A935A0A1B3C3AFFF6CDDB43AD2ABF69AA6848C65882F9D109996E0CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article is not about defending a politician but criticising feminists/organisations who were quick to be outraged by the joke but who ignore much bigger harms to women’s interests, perceived to be too awkward to mention. This is very clear if you read the article: https://archive.ph/PxR4t

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1741771310240243807
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9A100727A935A0A1B3C3AFFF6CDDB43AD2ABF69AA6848C65882F9D109996E0CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1704132886859
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17417713102402438079A100727A935A0A1B3C3AFFF6CDDB43AD2ABF69AA6848C65882F9D109996E0CA