Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-29 14:06:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3430AE31A06407284E287716295BB6692BDB07946F53D2046D1112114FF4B3DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Stop abusing the notes system and keep comments in the replies. The post is a critical analysis of the NYT piece, simply repeating its claims does not discount what was said.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1741208733223370922
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3430AE31A06407284E287716295BB6692BDB07946F53D2046D1112114FF4B3DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1706537182428
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17412087332233709223430AE31A06407284E287716295BB6692BDB07946F53D2046D1112114FF4B3DE