Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 05:31:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 33DAC10B53F618FED71243D92902640524A6F32EC7466793455D279DE8FF1BBD
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Whether they stay or not is a separate issue, if you are arguing they don’t, provide proper sources/data. Re: methodologies changing, an interesting point but needs a non paywalled source (the statista source e.g. is paywalled so noters can’t check/compare the data).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1741091324583903291
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 33DAC10B53F618FED71243D92902640524A6F32EC7466793455D279DE8FF1BBD
  • createdAtMillis - 1704778306563
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174109132458390329133DAC10B53F618FED71243D92902640524A6F32EC7466793455D279DE8FF1BBD