Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 00:30:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00F30832A9AA5F1A12640A8583EE64202CDE3761A692CDB282F50F365AAEDABD
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Whether they stay or not is a separate issue, if you are arguing they don’t, provide proper sources/data. Re: methodologies changing, an interesting point but needs a non paywalled source (the statista source e.g. is paywalled so noters can’t check/compare the data).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1741091324583903291
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00F30832A9AA5F1A12640A8583EE64202CDE3761A692CDB282F50F365AAEDABD
  • createdAtMillis - 1704760248466
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174109132458390329100F30832A9AA5F1A12640A8583EE64202CDE3761A692CDB282F50F365AAEDABD