Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-29 23:42:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC2B4BF5748438351F29B153B2B968E2D63FF1ADBDE6D32E1CAF248E3EC907F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. Especially one that automatically presumes to chime in “but Hamas!” Article 57 of the Geneva Convention is clear enough. You can make arguments about article 52, but with the lack of effort in verifying targets in the first place, those arguments are moot. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/article-57

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740800242159857942
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC2B4BF5748438351F29B153B2B968E2D63FF1ADBDE6D32E1CAF248E3EC907F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1703893323812
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1740800242159857942EC2B4BF5748438351F29B153B2B968E2D63FF1ADBDE6D32E1CAF248E3EC907F6