Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-29 19:54:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B051D41350DD74DB36F99AB3CDC4BF648181FCBF6B64E8C8B9A0DB7068AA67CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. Especially one that automatically presumes to chime in “but Hamas!” Article 57 of the Geneva Convention is clear enough. You can make arguments about article 52, but with the lack of effort in verifying targets in the first place, those arguments are moot. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/article-57

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740800242159857942
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B051D41350DD74DB36F99AB3CDC4BF648181FCBF6B64E8C8B9A0DB7068AA67CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1703879665446
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1740800242159857942B051D41350DD74DB36F99AB3CDC4BF648181FCBF6B64E8C8B9A0DB7068AA67CA