Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-28 23:33:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 09900C109940B3215F43F7948050525E31100A7975D01A9E63CC7696F8FC53DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

the post is a playful juxtaposition. it doesn't claim the NYT is taking any particular stance on plagiarism etc just because it's quoting Harvard's use of "duplicative language". here's the original article the screenshot is from, which wasn't modified except with a highlight: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/20/us/harvard-claudine-gay-plagiarism.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740513350591950957
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 09900C109940B3215F43F7948050525E31100A7975D01A9E63CC7696F8FC53DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1703806422723
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174051335059195095709900C109940B3215F43F7948050525E31100A7975D01A9E63CC7696F8FC53DD