Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-28 23:11:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2BE3D28A19E47F0FC3E2BC67BE7271D4A82B252937F176FB3E026948E5F107BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

掲載誌は疑わしい情報源である事に注意。 Dove Medical Pressは編集プロセスに十分な厳密性が欠如しているとして、OASPAは彼らのメンバーシップを終了しています。 https://oaspa.org/oaspas-second-statement-following-the-article-in-science-entitled-whos-afraid-of-peer-review/#:~:text=Our%20key%20conclusion%20from%20these%20discussions%20is%20that%20there%20was%20a%20lack%20of%20sufficient%20rigour%20in%20editorial%20processes%20at%20all%20three%20of%20the%20journals%20in%20question%2C%20and%20that%20for%20Hikari%20and%20Dove%20the%20issues%20may%20extend%20wider%20than%20the%20single%20affected%20journal

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740508800132809150
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2BE3D28A19E47F0FC3E2BC67BE7271D4A82B252937F176FB3E026948E5F107BC
  • createdAtMillis - 1703805115670
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17405088001328091502BE3D28A19E47F0FC3E2BC67BE7271D4A82B252937F176FB3E026948E5F107BC