Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-28 20:41:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E5A116EAD5F9A5386EDA1A5BE67416C163FA55EE1B5FF5716702C50A171F5C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

SSS A segunda nota proposta apresenta sim um CONTEXTO. Notas não são apenas para refutar um tuite, mas adicionam informações relevantes, mesmo se o tuite original fosse opinativo ("mais efetivo que") https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/about/introduction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740466150272581762
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E5A116EAD5F9A5386EDA1A5BE67416C163FA55EE1B5FF5716702C50A171F5C5
  • createdAtMillis - 1703796118492
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17404661502725817628E5A116EAD5F9A5386EDA1A5BE67416C163FA55EE1B5FF5716702C50A171F5C5