Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-29 18:03:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4C7FE91EED5CBD482C183BC1656B394262200027B4B38C47CF94F53B2B9E934
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP is extrapolating from the court ruling which upheld fines imposed because of the way the book was marketed. The period notes belong in comments, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740426835828343007
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4C7FE91EED5CBD482C183BC1656B394262200027B4B38C47CF94F53B2B9E934
  • createdAtMillis - 1703873026711
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1740426835828343007D4C7FE91EED5CBD482C183BC1656B394262200027B4B38C47CF94F53B2B9E934