Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-28 18:45:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8A2FBCECBB2B678DE7BC746B31DD405A0D90F07E3E064FCBEABED6DBB60C5F2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP is extrapolating from the court ruling which upheld fines imposed because of the way the book was marketed. The period notes belong in comments, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740426835828343007
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8A2FBCECBB2B678DE7BC746B31DD405A0D90F07E3E064FCBEABED6DBB60C5F2
  • createdAtMillis - 1703789120158
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1740426835828343007C8A2FBCECBB2B678DE7BC746B31DD405A0D90F07E3E064FCBEABED6DBB60C5F2