Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-29 15:01:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A30C2EC5A67DA72F0AC0E1A8CEBD8072A65EE67ABDE2437E0930554BB19E95B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP is extrapolating from the court ruling which upheld fines imposed because of the way the book was marketed. The period notes belong in comments, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740426835828343007
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A30C2EC5A67DA72F0AC0E1A8CEBD8072A65EE67ABDE2437E0930554BB19E95B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1703862099027
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1740426835828343007A30C2EC5A67DA72F0AC0E1A8CEBD8072A65EE67ABDE2437E0930554BB19E95B6