Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-28 17:10:49 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7C15B03B5536F9A0D11D5BD8404244E44AEB127CA89BDAFC4F2D92DF642B8B0B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Plusieurs des personnes citées dans ce fil ont été innocentées par des jurys populaires ayant pu examiner les faits et entendre directement la parole des plaignant-e-s. Les opinions d’utilisateurs de X sans accès au dossier ne sauraient se substituer à ce procédé rigoureux. https://www.justice.gouv.fr/justice-france/acteurs-justice/juges-non-professionnels/jure-dassises

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740408807866470455
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7C15B03B5536F9A0D11D5BD8404244E44AEB127CA89BDAFC4F2D92DF642B8B0B
  • createdAtMillis - 1703783449444
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17404088078664704557C15B03B5536F9A0D11D5BD8404244E44AEB127CA89BDAFC4F2D92DF642B8B0B