Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-28 05:08:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4AD4E690EA7AAC8B77F096E14F3E8D224B8A03D3014B8C970CD63CE9BD6E072E
Participant Details

Original Note:

国による代執行は地方自治法245条の8に定められたものであり、本件は福岡高裁那覇支部の判決を受けて行われた。 よって、本件は地方自治法に則って行われたものであることに留意。 https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/document?lawid=322AC0000000067

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740216148581658900
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4AD4E690EA7AAC8B77F096E14F3E8D224B8A03D3014B8C970CD63CE9BD6E072E
  • createdAtMillis - 1703740115065
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17402161485816589004AD4E690EA7AAC8B77F096E14F3E8D224B8A03D3014B8C970CD63CE9BD6E072E