Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-27 20:04:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F937C62294549D25BCA71F31C2DC392C1C2E482932A68CA0405DC2E1D82CFD54
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://law.indiana.edu/instruction/tanford/b723/05prej/T05.pdf The note about prejudice does not accurately reflect this source. There is no "factually incorrect" category for barring an argument, and the jury, not the judge, is the finder of fact. If evidence of a defense can be presented, it goes to the jury.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740086514871128473
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F937C62294549D25BCA71F31C2DC392C1C2E482932A68CA0405DC2E1D82CFD54
  • createdAtMillis - 1703707479308
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1740086514871128473F937C62294549D25BCA71F31C2DC392C1C2E482932A68CA0405DC2E1D82CFD54