Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-28 07:29:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E984D495636D5DFF688F861818EF694637842CFF13EC8B0A59A83CF6803B0A31
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://law.indiana.edu/instruction/tanford/b723/05prej/T05.pdf The note about prejudice does not accurately reflect this source. There is no "factually incorrect" category for barring an argument, and the jury, not the judge, is the finder of fact. If evidence of a defense can be presented, it goes to the jury.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740086514871128473
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E984D495636D5DFF688F861818EF694637842CFF13EC8B0A59A83CF6803B0A31
  • createdAtMillis - 1703748575784
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1740086514871128473E984D495636D5DFF688F861818EF694637842CFF13EC8B0A59A83CF6803B0A31