Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-27 22:12:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8CAC9BC95D54D7532645BB1BAA07B778F6577EF222F13197CED676A1DC0B5C46
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://law.indiana.edu/instruction/tanford/b723/05prej/T05.pdf The note about prejudice does not accurately reflect this source. There is no "factually incorrect" category for barring an argument, and the jury, not the judge, is the finder of fact. If evidence of a defense can be presented, it goes to the jury.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740086514871128473
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8CAC9BC95D54D7532645BB1BAA07B778F6577EF222F13197CED676A1DC0B5C46
  • createdAtMillis - 1703715141032
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17400865148711284738CAC9BC95D54D7532645BB1BAA07B778F6577EF222F13197CED676A1DC0B5C46